<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ax&#8217;s Theorem: An Application of Logic to Ordinary Mathematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xorshammer.com/2008/08/15/axs-theorem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/08/15/axs-theorem/</link>
	<description>Some things in mathematical logic that I find interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:53:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Zelinsky</title>
		<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/08/15/axs-theorem/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Zelinsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very nice theorem. One thing that I&#039;ve been wondering about in this context is whether there are any examples of injective polynomials f that aren&#039;t surjective.

Incidentally, one way to think of this theorem is as a generalization of the fundamental theorem of algebra since in the single variable case all polynomials are surjective. Similarly, one gets from Picard&#039;s theorem that all injective analytic functions are surjective (consider f composed with itself).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very nice theorem. One thing that I&#8217;ve been wondering about in this context is whether there are any examples of injective polynomials f that aren&#8217;t surjective.</p>
<p>Incidentally, one way to think of this theorem is as a generalization of the fundamental theorem of algebra since in the single variable case all polynomials are surjective. Similarly, one gets from Picard&#8217;s theorem that all injective analytic functions are surjective (consider f composed with itself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cups, Peas, and Grothendieck &#171; Gödel&#8217;s Lost Letter and P=NP</title>
		<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/08/15/axs-theorem/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cups, Peas, and Grothendieck &#171; Gödel&#8217;s Lost Letter and P=NP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] called the Ax-Grothendieck theorem&#8212;after James Ax and Grothendieck. I love this beautiful theorem and am currently trying to extend it. My combinatorial problem is a lemma that I need to prove my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] called the Ax-Grothendieck theorem&#8212;after James Ax and Grothendieck. I love this beautiful theorem and am currently trying to extend it. My combinatorial problem is a lemma that I need to prove my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathematical Embarrassments &#171; Gödel&#8217;s Lost Letter and P=NP</title>
		<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/08/15/axs-theorem/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathematical Embarrassments &#171; Gödel&#8217;s Lost Letter and P=NP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Amazing. The full proof is based on a simple compactness argument and this simple observation. See this for a nice exposition by Michael [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazing. The full proof is based on a simple compactness argument and this simple observation. See this for a nice exposition by Michael [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjlipton</title>
		<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/08/15/axs-theorem/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjlipton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I linked to your proof. One of my favorite theorems/proofs. So cool that such a simple idea can be made to work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I linked to your proof. One of my favorite theorems/proofs. So cool that such a simple idea can be made to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

