Comments on: A Geometrically Natural Uncomputable Function http://xorshammer.com/2008/09/04/a-geometrically-natural-uncomputable-function/ Some things in mathematical logic that I find interesting Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:53:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: mkoconnor http://xorshammer.com/2008/09/04/a-geometrically-natural-uncomputable-function/#comment-92 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:36:17 +0000 http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=148#comment-92 You’re absolutely right. Thanks for the correction.

(By the way, in WordPress $<math in latex>$ doesn’t work. You have to write $latex <math in latex>$. I edited your comment since presumably that’s what you wanted.)

]]> By: Richard Zach http://xorshammer.com/2008/09/04/a-geometrically-natural-uncomputable-function/#comment-91 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:42:59 +0000 http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=148#comment-91 Just to make sure I understand: the f_n has nothing to do with the embedding f, right? And you mean “for any dimension n there is an f_n such that any embedding of crumbledness <c can be isotoped to the equatorial embedding going through only embeddings of crumbledness <f_n(c)“?

]]>