<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avoiding Set-Theoretic Paradoxes using Symmetry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xorshammer.com/2008/09/21/avoiding-set-theoretic-paradoxes-using-symmetry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/09/21/avoiding-set-theoretic-paradoxes-using-symmetry/</link>
	<description>Some things in mathematical logic that I find interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 79th Philosophers&#8217; Carnival &#171; Possibly Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://xorshammer.com/2008/09/21/avoiding-set-theoretic-paradoxes-using-symmetry/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>The 79th Philosophers&#8217; Carnival &#171; Possibly Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xorshammer.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael O&#8217;Connor* discusses an interesting proposal to motivate NF like systems based on considerations of symmetry under permutations: Avoiding Set-Theoretic paradoxes using symmetry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael O&#8217;Connor* discusses an interesting proposal to motivate NF like systems based on considerations of symmetry under permutations: Avoiding Set-Theoretic paradoxes using symmetry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
